NAFDAC IS RIGHT, EU IS RIGHT
NAFDAC IS RIGHT, EU IS RIGHT
by sfoodfee
The recent issue on the level of
preservative in a soft drink regarding NAFDAC , the exporter and the
EU is interesting . One thing is clear==NAFDAC is right and the EU is
also right. The acceptable daily intake (ADI)for a preservative is
different from one country or regional body to the other. The ADI is
always arrived at based on available toxicological data of such
additive on native rats or human models. Being workable and
enforceable will depend on the capacity/willingness of other
stakeholders , like farmers exporters , solution providers to accept
and operate . The Codex standards are the global standards.
Standards observed in a country do not
have to be copied by another. For example the US sets a ‘weaker’
standard on aflatoxin than the EU. The implication is that a
particular product from US may be rejected by the EU. It should be
noted most EU legislations on food are very stringent. It is the duty
of the importer to EU to be abreast of requirement regarding the
product in question, not the regulatory agency. Equally, every
country has a role to play in safeguarding the health of her citizens
at all times and are not directly answerable to an importer, when
approved legislations are already confirmed to be in the public
space
The subsisting ban on beans export to
EU from Nigeria on account of unacceptable dichlorvos level is also
a proof of the limits of the regulatory agencies and importing
nations, although in this particular case, the contaminant cannot be
described as an additive.
Comments
Post a Comment